Social Media Girls

It's a little puzzling though, because, as I said earlier, her socials clearly feature implied nature nudes. Feature is the key word here: it's not just some one-time hot photo - it's a recurring theme in her social feed. So when she goes on and opens actual fanpages, it's strange for them to drop the very feature that fanpages are most associated with, which her social feed *does* have.

I'm not saying she's obligated to start posting nudes. But what's the appeal of the fanpage gonna be if they're going to have *less* points of interest as compared to her social feeds?

I fully agree but there is a thing called social scam, when people start requesting refunds, that's when you'll get more uncensored. There's this one called tismpump who attempted it. She did nudes finally but charged stupid money. There was a few leaks then people stopped paying because she ripped a few off. I was one of them

My point is, especially for the passes, wait a month then if she doesn't drop a nude request a refund. Argue til they give it to you.

I don't so much think that it's necessarily a scam, as much as I dislike the gaslighting - when (a) the girl seems to posts implied nudes on her social feeds, (b) that girl becomes very popular, with a large portion of the followers being males interested in her hot content, (c) that girl then starts a fanpage that charges money for "exclusive content", but (d) the "exclusive content" contains **less** of that major factor in her popularity and arguably the #1 reason why most sign-up for that fanpage; instead, it contains just more of the same type of content that social media has.


Is it a scam? I don't think so, unless her page actually advertises nudes and then doesn't post it. But it's definitely mixed messaging, arguably misleading, and just leaves a bad taste in my mouth. Just the <d> from above doesn't match <a/b/c/>, especially when the persona on the fanpage acts all surprised when people ask her about that thing that she does on her social feeds, and with which she leads them onto the fanpage.

Sorry for the rant lmao

Edit. P.S.: Ultimately, she isn't obligated to us to become a sex content creator. If she's uncomfortable with doing nudes, who are we to "demand" it from her. Just stop leading people on with it, opening fan-pages with "exclusive content," do flirty suggestive marketing of that page, then - as if deliberately - make that page as non-sexy as possible.