Social Media Girls

Social Media Girls

  • Going forward please follow these rules when posting:

    -The content MUST be from TikTok, do not post slips from other platforms.

    -You MUST include profile names / link to the profile, or make every attempt to include it.

    -Include timestamps if you post a long video or a full live video.

    -Make sure ALL girls posted are 18+

  • Please make sure all of the videos and screenshots you're posting are only of people over the age of 18.

    This also means no children in the background.

    No more warnings.

Welcome to the Social Media Girls Forum!
Feel free to sign up and join the discussion on all your favourite Social Media Girls. YouTube and Twitch oops moments, Onlyfans leaks, Celebrity sex tapes and More! It's free and takes 10 seconds!
Sign up
james__bond
james__bond commented
It's a little puzzling though, because, as I said earlier, her socials clearly feature implied nature nudes. Feature is the key word here: it's not just some one-time hot photo - it's a recurring theme in her social feed. So when she goes on and opens actual fanpages, it's strange for them to drop the very feature that fanpages are most associated with, which her social feed *does* have.

I'm not saying she's obligated to start posting nudes. But what's the appeal of the fanpage gonna be if they're going to have *less* points of interest as compared to her social feeds?
 
rallardnyc
rallardnyc commented
I fully agree but there is a thing called social scam, when people start requesting refunds, that's when you'll get more uncensored. There's this one called tismpump who attempted it. She did nudes finally but charged stupid money. There was a few leaks then people stopped paying because she ripped a few off. I was one of them
 
rallardnyc
rallardnyc commented
My point is, especially for the passes, wait a month then if she doesn't drop a nude request a refund. Argue til they give it to you.
 
james__bond
james__bond commented
I don't so much think that it's necessarily a scam, as much as I dislike the gaslighting - when (a) the girl seems to posts implied nudes on her social feeds, (b) that girl becomes very popular, with a large portion of the followers being males interested in her hot content, (c) that girl then starts a fanpage that charges money for "exclusive content", but (d) the "exclusive content" contains **less** of that major factor in her popularity and arguably the #1 reason why most sign-up for that fanpage; instead, it contains just more of the same type of content that social media has.


Is it a scam? I don't think so, unless her page actually advertises nudes and then doesn't post it. But it's definitely mixed messaging, arguably misleading, and just leaves a bad taste in my mouth. Just the <d> from above doesn't match <a/b/c/>, especially when the persona on the fanpage acts all surprised when people ask her about that thing that she does on her social feeds, and with which she leads them onto the fanpage.

Sorry for the rant lmao

Edit. P.S.: Ultimately, she isn't obligated to us to become a sex content creator. If she's uncomfortable with doing nudes, who are we to "demand" it from her. Just stop leading people on with it, opening fan-pages with "exclusive content," do flirty suggestive marketing of that page, then - as if deliberately - make that page as non-sexy as possible. 🤷🏻‍♂️