Social Media Girls

  • Going forward please follow these rules when posting:

    -The content MUST be from TikTok, do not post slips from other platforms.

    -You MUST include profile names / link to the profile, or make every attempt to include it.

    -Include timestamps if you post a long video or a full live video.

    -Make sure ALL girls posted are 18+

Welcome to the Social Media Girls Forum!
Feel free to sign up and join the discussion on all your favourite Social Media Girls. YouTube and Twitch oops moments, Onlyfans leaks, Celebrity sex tapes and More! It's free and takes 10 seconds!
Sign up
17 Comments View previous comments…
erni1400
erni1400 commented
luistnt
Yeah they looks odd like in 2nd stage of development. Especially nipples.
 
R
Ruivox commented
fdq
In this case no: the images are .PNG with over 10MB each. And with the resolution of arounf 3000x2000 is a perfect proportion of quality versus file size. Whoever grabbed the files from the site did a great job of choosing PNG with such size. This quality just isn't better than the original .RAW files Bridget's mom had access. Everything looking bad in the photos were filters on top, trust me. Check this Elle Fanning photo, similar resolution, but crap .jpg, and crap 600kb size , and you still can see the pores on her perfect face... (Ellen Fanning is like a human doll on how perfect she is )
 
erni1400
erni1400 commented
Ruivox
Yeah, i collect photos since 2010 and I see better cameras in phones (I had 3Mpix which was great in 2009 now I saw 100Mpix) but photos looks worse because of compression of sites. Same videos, I record video in MP4 4K and have around 50Mbps, when I put same video on YT it drops to 5-10Mbps. Netflx use 2,5Mbps for 4K :D
 
B
Bdsmhardcore1234 commented
I guess full nude soon?
 
Top Bottom