You must be registered for see links
You must be registered for see links
To our gal
10
Comments
View previous comments…
Fully agreed on them needing to up their game - but so far it seems she has mostly plateaued, and even taken a step back from see-through videos. The hottest stuff I've seen (which, again, is pretty hot for a fan), is her taking off her top, being implied topless (e.g. side-boob, very rare nip slip, handbra), plus some see-through and/or wet shirt stuff from earlier. Hope she brings back the see-through and goes beyond, but so far don't see signs of it, unfortunately.
T
TBH, I wouldn't even mind if she wore nipple covers, as long as I could see those puppies bouncing freely...
Man, fuck the nip covers
. But fully agree on bounding freely is fucking amazing. One of the only downsides to that white lingerie vid. Good news is, she's released some content lately that's see-through (but very little), and where she's ditched the nip covers. So, fingers crossed she keeps it that way.
T
All I'm saying is if her problem for going topless without covering her boobs is because of showing nipples, then I wouldn't mind at all if she covered only her nips, like Sophie Mudd does, for example. All I'd want from her is to see those incredible tits in all their full glory. It's not like she didn't already pose with her breasts uncovered for a photoshoot when she was younger. I only wish I could see them now, since they've grown exponentially larger since that time. That's all.


To me, she's in between good and bad creators. She's not bad because some of her content is pretty hot (take that see-through white lingerie, for example). On the other hand, she' (well, her agency) is charging those high prices for content that has little to no nudity, so obviously not ideal (except if you quality under a and b above, lol).