Mikaela Lafuente
Is her ass fake?
Arguments for her ass being fake:
Objectively: none. It's all hearsay and speculation. The strongest argument here is: her ass is too big. There's so much lack of argument here that I had to resort to GROK to make a case:
First, the proportions are strikingly unnatural. Lafuente's tiny waist juxtaposed with an exaggerated, shelf-like butt defies typical genetic distributions of body fat, especially for someone with her slim frame. In a Reddit thread on r/LAinfluencersnark, users compare her to Mikaela Testa, who openly admitted to fat transfer, noting how Lafuente's shape "looks so unnatural" and resembles post-surgical results. Critics point out the lack of muscle definition or gradual development one would expect from gym work, instead highlighting the telltale signs of BBL: hip dips filled unnaturally and a projection that appears bolted on.
Timeline evidence further supports this. Pre-2021 photos of Lafuente rarely showcase her butt, with her social media focusing elsewhere. Suddenly, post-2021, thirst-trap content emphasizing her enhanced curves proliferates. Commenters speculate this coincides with a trip to Miami, a hub for BBL surgeries, suggesting she "saw the standard and copied." TikTok discussions, including "before fat transfer" searches, reveal side-by-side comparisons showing a flatter figure evolving into her current form, implying augmentation.
Additionally, indirect admissions surface. Her ex-boyfriend Bryce Hall jokingly stated on Snapchat, "Mika did a BBL," while she laughed and denied it—behavior often seen in influencers downplaying procedures. Rumors persist of two BBLs, with some claiming she was "transparent about it years ago on TikTok," though videos are scarce. Defenders cite Latina genetics, but skeptics argue such perfection requires intervention in an era of filtered ideals.
Arguments for her ass being natural:
The "sources" GROK uses are reddit and "surgery speculation sites", who just simply pull shit out of their ass and make up changes that literally didn't happen, comparing pictures with different focal lenghts, lighting source, or age of the model to come up with nonsensical arguments.
Most are entirely subjective, clearly. "Her ass is too big", "the shape looks unnatural", "her body shape is weird", or literall banter between partners.
Others are just wrong: Mika does have EXTREMELY evident hip dips from the front, which is a telltale sign that she didn't do any BBL:
[Login or Register to view]
That's not a shape a surgeon would come up with. This is a real BBL, for comparison:
One of the first things you see in a BBL and hip filling patient is a curve that fills the concave shape formed by the head of the femur and the top of the hips. Mika has a pretty stricking dip when she's not posing.
[Login or Register to view]
When she's not posing. Remember that, because you gotta remember that she's constantly pushing her ass back and choosing poses that make it rounder, so that it looks even better than it already does! That's literally modeling 101!
Look at her legs too. They're the size you'd expect for someone with such a huge ass: big, fat, meaty thighs and plumpy calves. If she had made injections or BBL, her knees and shins would look fucking microscopic compared to her hips, which is the reason why they never show you the lower section of the legs in BBL examples and before/afters. Look at this and tell me this is how Mikaela looks like:
[Login or Register to view]
If you take a look at her instagram there are pictures all the way back to 2022 before her jump to fame, her ass is literally identical. There are people saying that they could find pics from 2020/2021 (when she was 19 or 20), and it looked the same. You can notice it in posts like these.
2021, she wasn't a model yet, and she was 19 here. Notice her hips:
2021, third picture, look at her ass:
Pretty big, uh? Again, 2021
This is from 2020, she was 18 here
And if you go take a look at tagged pics on her insta profile, you'll see she had that ass even when she was 16/17.
If it were fake, it would have changed shape drastically, the most that happened instead is that it slightly changed size, as a normal ass would. As I've said before, I've never seen a girl do surgery so early an not touch her nose, tits, hips ratio. The first thing a surgeon would tell a girl like her is precisely to "correct" her nose and to put small bolt-ons on her chest, which she hasn't. What's the rationale for wanting a random enormous ass and zero treatment elsewhere? A surgeon would 100% oppose that, and would at most increase the size until it's proportional to the other treatment.
My verdict is that she's 100% natural.
