Off Topic Brooke Marsden // Marsden It Discussion

[mateodiscreto]

hmm nope

 

[No-Chill Guy]

https://forums.socialmediagirls.com/threads/explicit-nude-try-on-haul.187493/page-111

 

[kurosaki6]

The funny thing is Brooke does the same content but with different outfits and people seen everything she showed head to toe basically nude and people still want to see more and the funniest thing I heard up here a guy talking about the queen yeah Brooke is a queen eating food gaining weight and drinking Pepsi

 

[Straven]

Brooke has fans because she's been doing this a while now. She's developed a personality over the years that a lot of people like and want to see more of. Unlike Arina, she's at least genuine and fair with her fans. If you don't like Brooke with a bit extra weight, then simply leave? It's ok to have constructive or valid criticism, but if you're just here to berate, then what's the point?

 

[lakeflaccid15]

Yeah, she doesn't need to stop doing content. She need a therapist, These young females need to comprehend they are sex workers. Anyways, I'll probably miss my Late Friday Routine.

 

[collector867]

No one here will be happy until she's spread eagle, five knuckles deep, while standing on one hand with lit sparklers sticking out of her asshole.

And even then, someone will complain.

 

[YorpZorpNorp]

"Where's the watersports?"

 

[mateodiscreto]

Oh shit... what will I do now every friday. ​

 

[thisguy39]

Nope, modern nomenclature is that all people who engage in activity that provoke sexual arousal are "sexy workers." Get with the times.

 

[Straven]

So we are saying there is no difference between a prostitute and someone that flashes in a bedroom? Then fuck "the times" - that is simply incorrect.

 

[philkenseben]

Not all rectangles are squares but all squares are rectangles. It’s still sex work but it isn’t prostitution.

 

[Straven]

Here's where speaking to people on a porn forum gets fucking tedious. That analogy assumes the disputed point: that both already belong in the same meaningful category of “sex work.” It doesn’t prove the category makes sense; it just repeats the claim.

 

[philkenseben]

I’m not an expert on the matter but she is providing a sexual product for compensation.

[Login or Register to view]
Wikipedia can do a better job explaining it than I can. Sex work is real work.

 

[Straven]

That still just repeats the broad definition. Nobody said she isn’t being paid for sexual content; the point is that calling both flashing and prostitution “sex work” hides enormous differences between them. “Sex work is real work” is a separate argument entirely.

 

[thisguy39]

If the work one is doing is done with the intent of making my dick spit, it's sexual. So I guess it might be more accurate to call it "sexual, or maybe sexualized, work." But that would really be splitting hairs.